One of the main criticisms of bioidentical hormone therapy is that “there are no studies on bioidentical hormones.” In fact, there are many excellent publications that demonstrate the benefits of bioidentical hormone therapy. Some of the studies show a greater margin of safety with bioidentical progesterone over the non-bioidentical progestin, Provera. Those that support Premarin and Provera point to a number of studies that were done. However, 26 of them were biased and, what’s worse, the bias was covered up. If Wyeth needed to “give credit” to other physicians for their research on their own products, what were they trying to cover up? What did they know that they weren’t saying? Why weren’t there independent groups that could have demonstrated the benefits of Premarin and Provera?

Q: I’ve been holding my breath for the last few days waiting for a biopsy to determine whether or not I have a cancerous uterus. My annually scheduled pelvic ultrasound last week indicated that my uterus walls had thickened to 12 mm (they should be around 5 mm). My wonderful gynecologist told

Dr. Alicia Stanton, Chief Medical Officer of BodyLogicMD is excited to see so many qualified doctors transitioning into Anti-Aging medicine. Patrick Savage, President of BodyLogicMD is excited to see how many more physicians are attending the A4M Conferences.

The information provided on this blog is for reference use only, and does not constitute the rendering of legal, financial or other professional advice or recommendations by the BodyLogicMD affiliated physician. This page is not for the use of diagnosing and/or treating medical issues.